This Roman Emperor Was Actually a Trans Woman, According to U.K. Museum

Emperor Elagabalus’ identity has been the source of historical debate for decades.
Roman Emperor Elagabalus Was In Fact a Trans Woman Says U.K. Museum
Image via Getty. Collage by June Buck.

Like every bro alive, apparently (including, as of this weekend’s SNL, Jason Momoa), we’re also thinking about the Roman Empire way too much this week, now that a U.K. museum has announced it will officially refer to the emperor Elagabalus as transgender.

A new policy at the North Hertfordshire Museum in southeast England will see museum staff and materials use she/her pronouns and the term “transgender woman” when discussing Elagabulus, The Telegraph confirmed this week.

“We try to be sensitive to identifying pronouns for people in the past, as we are for people in the present. It is only polite and respectful,” Keith Hoskins, executive member for arts on the North Herts Council, told The Telegraph. “We know the Elagabalus identified as a woman and was explicit about which pronouns to use, which shows that pronouns are not a new thing.”

Elagabalus’ identity has been the source of historical debate for decades; The Sandman co-creator Neil Gaiman even made a comic about it in 1992. Some historians have maintained for years that Elagabalus — who was born in present-day Syria and ruled from 218 to 222 CE before being murdered by disgruntled members of the Praetorian Guard — did not actually identify as a woman. Instead, those historians believe antagonistic Roman chroniclers Cassius Dio and Herodian falsely portrayed Elagabalus as effeminate and a sexual taboo-breaker to provide cover for the killing (in other words, a character assassination following the actual assassination). But Hoskins, the author of multiple articles discussing Elagabulus for the museum, is more willing to take those accounts at face value.

“It is now known through evidence — such as Dio’s text — that Elagabalus most definitely preferred the ‘she’ pronoun,” Hoskins said, according to The Art Newspaper, “and as such this is something we reflect when discussing her in contemporary times, as we believe is standard practice elsewhere.”

Elagabalus was born Sextus Varius Avitus Bassianus, but took the official name Marcus Aurelius Antoninus upon assuming the throne, playing into rumors that she was the illegitimate heir to the previous Antoninus (later referred to as the last of the “Five Good Emperors” of Rome). The name “Elagabalus” came from the teenage emperor’s former position as head priest of the Cult of Elagabal; after being coronated, Elagabalus launched a campaign to replace Jupiter with her patron sun god, the beginning of a series of religious scandals that likely led to her short reign.

According to Dio’s accounts, Elagabalus insisted on being called “lady” rather than “lord,” and repeatedly sought any doctor in Rome who could give her a vagina — without success. As the University of Birmingham noted in 2021, Elagabalus also married Hierocles, a formerly enslaved charioteer, and apparently loved being called his “wife” or “mistress.” She reportedly wore makeup, although she did not shave her mustache, and in Herodian’s telling, “had no desire to sin in secret, but appeared in public with eyes painted and cheeks rouged.”

Pope at lunch table
It’s the latest in Pope Francis’ gestures of trans inclusion.

Obviously, the word “transgender” didn’t exist in the third century (because neither did the English language), and we’ll likely never have definitive proof of whether Dio and Herodian were lying or embellishing to justify Elagablus’ assassination. Still, it’s nice to see historians take another look at the data and challenge some preconceived notions about gender. The North Hertfordshire Museum’s change comes on the heels of a report from the University of Leicester in September, which called for more trans-inclusive and -informed policies in British museums and galleries.

“The label ‘trans’ [....] is not a replacement for the many tremendous opportunities to explore historic and cultural specificity,” the report noted, “but rather, a pathway to this research that enables audiences the opportunity to use their contemporary understanding of gender to learn more about it in the past.”

Get the best of what’s queer. Sign up for Them’s weekly newsletter here.